If you can,please do.(although we talked about it before.įor what is considered to be one of the very best deinterlacers out there. My main objectiv eto FD was poor handling of still parts of image.(like mentioned logo's grsaphics,inprinted subtitles etc.) Well, I don't know how bad the interlacing is since I haven't even ripped the DVD yet, but the overall image quality is very poor (read what I said to you post a few screenshots to prove FD is better than KD.in ANY respect (and let us see some tv-station logo's and static graphics that were in the video)? What version do you guys recommend me to use? IIRC, the DLL included in the WarpSharp+XSharpen package for Avisynth v2.5x had some issues. Now that you guys mention it, I recall a thread in which Richard Berg said he liked it too. HeadlessCow, I4004: thanks for the WarpSharp reccomendation. Can you believe that the DVD source I'm using looks considerably worse than your source (I assume those were "before-after" screenshots), barrying the resolution difference? What do you mean by "beating the crap out of MipSmooth" exactly? Is MSmooth that much better than MipSmooth for severe block removal and sligh smoothing? When you do IVTC, decomb does some postprocessing (i.é: deinterlacing) by default to eliminate any remaining combing artifacts. HeadlessCow, as I said to Laner, I'm just replacing Telecide's postprocessing (which uses the FielDeinterlace filter) for what is considered to be one of the very best deinterlacers out there. The Simpsons 1st Season DVDs look like shit. I'm probably using much less filtering than I should, though. Its line is long just because I'm not using the presets. Laner, if you look closely, there isn't really that much filtering going on: KernelDeint is there because I prefer to use that instead of Telecide's postprocessor, Undot() is basically harmless and then I have mipsmooth as a smoother.
0 kommentar(er)
